Updating

Description

The Undisclosed podcast investigates wrongful convictions, and the U.S. criminal justice system, by taking a closer look at the perpetration of a crime, its investigation, the trial, and ultimate verdict... and finding new evidence that never made it to court.

Apple Podcasts: Customer Reviews

Going Downhill

 – 
cmryan07
 – 
2017-07-07
You should know what you're getting into if you start listening to this podcast. The hosts have an agenda prior to recording, and go to great lengths to win you over with a seemingly exhaustive amount of detail. It can be maddening to listen to the double-standards, hypocracy, and blatant bias presented as if it were cold, hard fact. While I can handle it in the regular episode, the Addendum has become a venue for clearly biased hosts and guests to sit in a pool of confirmation biases. The podcast would regain some respectability if the Addendum were spun off into it's own thing.
Season 1 did a really good job of doing a deep dive into the Adnan Syed case where Serial couldn't - even if the hosts and some of the guests seemed to take swipes at Serial's reporting. It was a great (but clearly biased) look at details around the case.
Season 2 was actually my favorite. The case was almost unknown outside of Georgia and it seemed like the hosts - while proclaiming Joey Watkins' innocence - went to lengths to explain the evidence (or lack thereof) and legal procedures, and how they intertwined, ultimately culminating in a guilt verdict for Watkins.
Season 3 was completely maddening for me. I had to stop listening to the Addendum after it became clear that D Watkins was more interested in whining about Baltimore PD than any real conversation about the case. The final few episodes go headfirst into tin-foil hat conspiracy stuff - insinuating that BPD orchestrated a massive cover-up involving dozens of people, forged signatures, fake documents, etc. Maybe they're right - but they do little to prove it and offer only their theories, which they ask in vain for their readers to believe.
I'd continue listening if there were more seasons like season 2, but as it stands, season 3 probably will be my last.

My favorite way to break my heart

 – 
Lorac VN
 – 
2017-07-07
I've listened to every season and loved them all – despite how heartbreaking it is to learn how very broken the justice system is.
Special shoutouts this season (Freddie Gray) to D. Watkins and Marcia Chatelain!!
At first it was very hard to listen to the addendums because of D's strong voice and views. It was just so different from my own experiences! But the more I opened myself to hear his reality, the more I realized how very little I have experienced and how true his words are.
Marcia spoke my language from the beginning. As a MA in history, I felt the historical context that Marcia brought was of incredible importance to underscore how long and complex racial discrimination in the justice system has been.
Thanks to all the Undisclosed team, guests, etc.! I'm looking forward to continuing to learn from you all!

Good

 – 
mightymouse416
 – 
2017-07-06
Rabia is the smartest person

Bring back the original team!

 – 
lgg37373
 – 
2017-07-06
Season 3 is so polemic, snarky, and based on feeling / bias rather than facts - bring the lawyers back in to focus on the facts. It's too important of a case to turn people off with such an aggressive approach - the addendum is particularly unhelpful and generally unproductive

Extremely Biased

 – 
Nick riles
 – 
2017-07-05
I've listened to Adnan's and Freddie's seasons on this show and I have to say it's extremely biased. Sometimes so clearly obvious that it's hard to listen to. Great quality though.

Informative

 – 
Mrs. Addison
 – 
2017-07-04
There was a lot of information that was presented. Thank you for relaying all the information that others ignored. The addendum was biased in its opinion but I loved it! (Since I'm biased too!)

Advocacy and Confirmation Bias at Its Finest

 – 
Neal22222
 – 
2017-07-03
Great pod if you can sort out the facts from the opinions and conjecture sold as fact. Wonderful to hear the steady drum beat of college educated elitists condemning everything and everyone they disagree with. If you want better police then you need to more adequately fund the police force and their training. It would be possible to raise the overall quality of the force if you were willing to pay for it. The on air personalities remind me of Northwestern University School of Journalism grads in professional sports locker rooms expecting athletes to wax poetic on the sublime nature of their performances. Come back to me when their is a "Police for America" equivalent to "Teach for America" pipelining Ivy League grads into police forces around the nation.

Decent podcast, but definitely biased.

 – 
vmitranspo
 – 
2017-07-01
I don't like the anti-police slant, but the podcast is entertaining and interesting. The Freddie Gray episodes are good, but NOT impartial fact-sharing (as the initial disclaimer insinuates). They are clearly unhappy with the verdicts and don't care for law enforcement.

Great season

 – 
CricketKiller1992
 – 
2017-07-01
It's been a great season, thank you to all of Undisclosed for your hard work.
I have to say that the last episode had me at the edge of my seat, and you made a great last addendum too.
Hope to hear you all (at least from whoever is continuing with the show) in a new season soon. And to all the rest, good luck!

The truth!

 – 
USAdamParis
 – 
2017-07-01
For content & investigative reporting, Undisclosed should be at #1. They uncovered the truth & the facts, the coverups and the lies. Absolutely amazing! True inveigayive reporting for justice for Freddie Gray! Shame on BPD! Bring the corruption down & hold these villains accountable!

Can't wait for the next season

 – 
amo032303
 – 
2017-06-29
Looking forward to having Rabia, Colin and Susan back together again!

Good but that vocal fry tho...

 – 
deejaybee-
 – 
2017-06-27
This has always been a good podcast but one of my major issues with it, and in general, is the grating vocal fry.
Not just on this podcast but many others as well. It gets to the point that I can't listen anymore and just give up on episodes. And it's unfortunate because it's easily avoidable and gets in the way of so much good content. I've heard people use the inflection because they believe it makes them sound more intelligent but it actually has the opposite effect.
Hopefully this phase will pass and I can make it through whole episodes once again.

It's interesting

 – 
Jesbar121:3
 – 
2017-06-27
They have thorough investigations and pretty legit information.... I just cannot stand how Robia talksss! She smacks and is way to close to the mic or something... drives me nuts.

Overly Biased

 – 
Pauly Pecans
 – 
2017-06-27
Clearly one sided anti police agenda. Wish they would give a more judicial look at their cases. Unsubscribe.

It's just not the same this year

 – 
JWL-fla
 – 
2017-06-27
With regret, I am posting this in the hope that after this 2017 Freddie Gray case, Undisclosed returns to something more like its first year. I admire the show so much but this year just did not hold my interest and I stopped listening after about 4 shows. I hope it helped Mr. Gray in some way.

One of the best

 – 
spcarver
 – 
2017-06-27
Hardest working crime podcast. Amazing

Great but w/ a few gripes

 – 
Mike Madison, est. 1977
 – 
2017-06-26
I've been following this pod since the Adnan Syed case and enjoy the details and information void of fluff.
My issue is with the addendum. As an African American male w/ three sons of my own, I know how important these stories are for their survival & education. I appreciate the hosts and their energy, but the music playing in the segues are off putting at best. The rap song that plays is of a violent nature and is a weird juxtaposition against the context and theme of the podcast as a whole. We're recounting the moments before, during, and after the tragic death of Freddie Gray, but a rap song that's soliciting people to "ride" and/or "die" for the rapper in the middle of the transitions feels in total opposition to the content.
I'm in my mid-thirties and am a child of hip hop, but even the most avid rap fan would find this song against the narrative strange. I'm sure that artist has a few more songs of a more less violent nature to match with this podcast for continuity's sake.

Lost me at season 3

 – 
Trw20
 – 
2017-06-24
Real shame. I was an avid listener but this one is no bueno.

rabia and jon need to leave the show

 – 
Ativan415
 – 
2017-06-24
the show should be hosted by susan and colin. rabia is a total fatty. jon is a failed actor.

So dang addicting

 – 
mamatobailey
 – 
2017-06-23
Really love this podcast. So interesting. Thought provoking.

Better because of this

 – 
anna.fox90
 – 
2017-06-23
I have learned so much from the Undisclosed team! I have become a much more informed and passionate citizen because of this podcast. I am so thrilled that this team is still together working hard. Thank you for all your work!

A bit hard to follow...

 – 
What a GREAT beginning!
 – 
2017-06-19
I am not as invested in this season as in the past two.

better than serial

 – 
Kittttt18
 – 
2017-06-19
Serial was a great story and great way to get the world into this case and recognize that this happens everywhere. However, Serial really had me going back and forth on whether or not Adnan was involved. I listened to the podcast over and over, and changed my mind 12 different times. Undisclosed has me no doubt believing that Adnan is innocent. This is the real evidence brought on by real lawyers. I'm late to the game, but I don't want to skip any episodes to find out the latest information on the appeal! #FreeAdnan

Racist, Smug and Anti-Semitic Liberals

 – 
CeeBee16
 – 
2017-06-18
They've had Keith Ellison on who has very openly stated a hatred of Jews and I assume Rabia agrees with him since she's in full compliance with the Quran.
Colin and Susan lick her boots because their liberal white guilt demands they do.
The episode they did bashing white People was good listening too:.

It is all in the details

 – 
knit3314
 – 
2017-06-17
I am so impressed with the level of detail these investigative journalists were able to compile, document online, and present on the death of Freddie Gray. I don't think as a lay person I could have put the details together in such a fashion as to see the real issues in this case. My concern is why aren't prosecutors able to investigate, research, and compile this much evidence to aid in getting to the truth. It amazes me how little a jury knows before they are tasked with concise instructions from a judge and someone's life is put in their hands. Great podcast.

Amazing Podcast

 – 
Excusmybeauty
 – 
2017-06-17
I love this podcast. Season 1, Season 2, and all of the little side projects they've had since season 2 have all been so fantastic with the exception of the Freddie Gray side project. It's just way too long and detailed to follow along as a podcast. The content is super interesting but the story is not executed well. It's so hard to follow all of the details in the way that it is narrated (I don't mind the narrator or the voice, just the way that it is storyboarded). I enjoy the addendum which is the only reason I've continued to listen to the series. I can't listen anymore though and will just have to wait for Season 3 to come out. It's a bummer because the topic has been interesting and insightful but I think this incredibly detailed and thoroughly investigated series would have been better served as a video podcast or a documentary.

Good information but gosh, Susan.

 – 
Campfirebananacanada
 – 
2017-06-17
As others have said. Slow down, Susan. She seems to talk the most. So you'll only get about 2/3 of the information. They have actually made fun of people saying this on the podcast. But it's 100% true. To be a good podcaster, you need to be open to improvement. Too frustrating for me to listen to because I'm just waiting for Susan to be done talking so someone else can speak -- at a normal rate of speech. Unsubscribed.

Slipping down hill

 – 
Inorbit007
 – 
2017-06-16
John Cryer was bad enough as an addendum host but this season's host Dee Watkins, He is so completely one sided. Growing very tire of him repeating the same things over and over again. Is it that hard to find a good host?

Solid podcasting

 – 
clutzclemens
 – 
2017-06-13
I'm in awe of the work they do.

Finally had to unsubscribe.

 – 
dougbiss
 – 
2017-06-13
The show has really gone downhill and no longer meets the description that they posted. This season has been almost entirely about race issues, first just the addendum but now even the main episodes. This is a worthy discussion and deserves its own forum, but this podcast isn't the place for it. This was an investigation and trial podcast that lost its way. There are too many other podcasts that actually focus on investigation, rather than making social commentary, to spend any more time on this one, at least until they find their way back to the format that made them so innovative and popular. Undisclosed... unsubscribed.

Serial was good. Undisclosed is Not good. Biased Podcast-don't waste your time

 – 
JessicaAZCHI
 – 
2017-06-11
They are overly biased. Not interested in listening in on this anymore! Adnan is guilty-he's supposed to be locked up. Maybe not enough evidence to do so, however I think the courts did a good job in getting the right person.

Unfortunate Turn in Season 3

 – 
J-Hart 83
 – 
2017-06-09
I loved the first two seasons of this podcast, but Season 3: The Killing of Freddie Gray has me shaking my head. The hosts let their political bias get in the way of what could potentially be a compelling case. I'm not saying I don't think there was wrongdoing by the cops, but the snarky tone of the new co-host, and the speratic snipes at President Trump make this season fall well short of their usual professionalism. I miss Colin and Susan. I can't comment much on the addendums because I stopped listening to them early in Season 2. John Cryer was unbearably annoying and the guy in Season 3 I only a few minutes of and wasn't going indulge anymore. I really hope they get back on track in the next season.

Why is only Freddie Gray's name in the title and why does it play like it's on Fast Forward???

 – 
Gold Member 26796326
 – 
2017-06-08
I downloaded this thinking it was about Freddie Gray, not Adnan Saaid. The female narrator speaks waaaaaaaaaay too fast and has a sometimes difficult-to-understand and annoying Valley Girl accent. I can't even listen to her

Over dramatized and biased

 – 
Glymmer1
 – 
2017-06-08
I like to listen to both sides of the story to get to the truth, but couldn't get past any episodes after #5 on the Killing of Freddie Gray. The story was told with so much bias and dramatic music that it made it all seem like fiction. To get to the bottom of a story tell both sides with an unbiased view and let the listener decide.

Engaging and informative

 – 
Belltoe
 – 
2017-06-08
I love these guys! I found that I really appreciated their complete attention to detail and their absolute patience when breaking down the finer technicalities of law and various terms. The conversational tone among the hosts makes this an engaging podcast to listen to. They build off of one another and work really well as team to cover all aspects of the topic at hand.

No more Addendum please

 – 
Sillypuppy
 – 
2017-06-07
I love the show. Always have. When you introduced the addendum shows with John Cryer, it was tolerable. However, the addendum on the Freddie Gray case is just horrible. The hosts spend most of their time putting down police and complaining about black rights instead of actually discussing the episode. It's very incongruous with the show. I don't listen to the addendum shows anymore and I suggest they either be removed or produced as their own entity.

Freddie Gray Addendums are maddening w/ too much liberal bias for me

 – 
Lock-N-Load
 – 
2017-06-06
Why is this the "killing" of Freddie and not the "death"? Bias right off the bat.
ALSO, they love to bag on topics that do not support their theory BUT then give the same topic credibility if it helps them. Total hypocrisy. An example? The camera system. If it does not show them what they want it is an overpriced, grainy, low quality, incomplete, sub-par system. BUT if it helps their case, they say "oh look the video shows this". Or the fact they endlessly complain about the number of cameras in the city and the privacy issues, and yet complain there are not enough cameras along the route or cameras working. What???
UPDATE: the current series about Freddie Gray episodes are bumming me out because CLEARLY there is no interest in an unbiased, reporting perspective by the host Amelia. She is so obviously biased, made her decision, and leans SO far left and against the police, when you listen to her she has bought in hook, line, sinker to anything related to this case that points to an injustice and glosses over anything that shows the contrary. The liberal leanings - the come through in odd little petty comments - are pretty gross and it seems like she is trying real hard to see and report only 1 side. The amount of pandering is blatant. She has done exactly what she is trying to fight against… taken 1 side and tried and condemned the police as guilty.
I honestly cannot listen to the Addendums, they are so, so, so overly biased and not even legit straight reporting. Often, they do the exact very things in the Addendums that they HATE and bemoan that investigators and police do.
UPDATE 2: I am out. I simply couldn't take the endless repetitive confirmation bias and bashing of the Police. They have no interest in showing what happened, only in showing how bad the white man is, how bad all police are, how the system is so rigged. Awful "reporting".
(I keep coming back to give an update for each series)

Brilliant minds. Love 90% of episodes. Wish it was more consistent, they're getting there

 – 
TracyMSP
 – 
2017-06-03
Update: In the past episode Colin seems to have slowed his speech to a conversational speed. Thank you Colin for listening to listener feedback!
I'm a long time listener and fan. Colin is a like a legal-Siri; however, listening to the last two episodes is like drinking legal information from a firehose. Great information, but provided much too fast to meaningfully comprehend.
Pauses are good and helpful. I've always been told, tell a story as you would to a best friend. I want to be able to listen and enjoy, but the latest episodes are too rapid-fire.
I enjoy suggested podcast by other listeners, my favorites:
Top 5 fav Serial True Crime: Serial (S1), In the Dark, Accused, Up and Vanished, Undisclosed (and Truth & Justice, the Ed Ates case)
Top 5 True Crime: Casefile, Criminal, Already Gone, True Crime Garage, Minds of Madness
Great Discussion Podcast: Crime Writers On (a must listen)

Give me back my life

 – 
56cats
 – 
2017-06-02
Really enjoy this podcast, but the format allows them to run amok taking more time every week to cover their topic. Please get an editor and realize no one has endless time to listen to one podcast.

Really Fabulous show

 – 
CrimeMind
 – 
2017-05-31
The latest investigation has gone on a little long for me, episodes have seemed more repetitive than in the past.
I have learned a tremendous amount about what I believe many are unaware of - you have in all of your cases uncovered corruption I think many would like to believe doesn't REALLY happen on a regular basis.
I believe it could be epidemic in many cities.
Keep shining a light, I really appreciate all you do to provide your listeners with real knowledge about such a horrible problem!

Sometimes hard to follow

 – 
Fatflip
 – 
2017-05-30
The Freddie Gray season is interesting at times but all the info about all the cameras....seriously I checked out during that time. Just too much info. We need a diagram. And can someone please tell Rabia to either stop smacking the few times she talks or get a new microphone. She sounds like her mouth is full of saliva and its like listening to someone chewing.

Revolutionary

 – 
Hriket
 – 
2017-05-29
Serial started it. But research, dedication and passion of undisclosed team started a new genre of podcasting

excellent detailed dialogue

 – 
Kay8or7
 – 
2017-05-27
fascinatingg and detailed.

Killing at Freddy gray

 – 
chili2016
 – 
2017-05-25
I always enjoyed the undisclosed podcast until the killing of Freddy gray. It doesn't look at things from all points of view as the attorneys have on past podcasts. It's One sided and it's really too bad that they spent so much time creating such it. It's clear they were out to prove the police and the government were in the wrong – not to actually find the truth.

Amazing!

 – 
Heatherleigh137
 – 
2017-05-22
The information provided here is so good and it answers the questions I had during Serial and the questions I didn't even know I had. Great information and very factual.

Killing of Freddie Gray

 – 
Truecrimepodcastnut
 – 
2017-05-21
This season was TERRIBLE! Very boring!

Had to Give it up This Season

 – 
Freddy4130
 – 
2017-05-20
The first two seasons were amazing. Even this season is amazing. But the addendum is a botched effort to jump on the hate whitey bandwagon. It's painful to listen to smart people spew hatred and nonsense. I listed for the first 6 episodes but I couldn't deal with it any longer. It seems like it wasn't enough that Freddie and his family were dealt a grave injustice. It's like the story itself isn't enough (it is in my opinion) to attract listeners so they tossed in an extra amount of trendy white hating rhetoric. Sad. I'll be glad when the ratings for this season prove that sticking to the facts and realities is better than trying to be trendy and risqué.

Freddie Gray

 – 
IIwtfIIwtfIIwtfII
 – 
2017-05-18
Hope that series is almost over, it's so boring and was over reported in the media. The freddie Gray story that is. There is absolutely no mystery with the case anything listeners can speculate on what really happened. Either the cops did it on purpose or accident. But thats it. Anyways hope the next series in this will get better. Adnan's was by far the best. Joey's was decent. But i hope everyone gets back together colin, rabia and susan so another normal season 3 can start. Get John back too, that D guy is garbage. I dont even listen to the Freddie episode i got sick of it after 3 or 4 so if i have some of the details wrong thats why. Pick it back up guys.

LOVE THIS

 – 
Zoderi
 – 
2017-05-18
I listen to all of Serial. Glad this podcast went threw all of the evidence in more detail. The cast was very informative on the legal issues. I like this podcast a lot.

Great podcast! Needs better editing!

 – 
J.Forthmann
 – 
2017-05-18
Love the content! Very very interesting but the editing should be better. I can't get past all of the wet mouth noises! It's very distracting!

It just keeps getting more biased and polarizing

 – 
Amandsasg
 – 
2017-04-21
I completely expected that the first season about Adnan would be biased considering the relationship between the hosts and Adnan and family. The second season seemed to be slightly less biased, but still very closed minded in terms of actually reviewing the case (not to mention the fact that the victim and the perspective of his family was completely ignored). This third season is so politically charged and biased that even very liberal minded people are turned off. I no longer subscribe and will probably not go back. The world receives enough biased and hate filled rhetoric from the media today. Listening to the hosts fuel that fire by completely closing their minds to the ideas and opinions of others only proves they are as bigoted as the people they adamantly oppose.

Pass On This Podcast

 – 
Blistener1212
 – 
2017-04-10
Very disappointing! What could have been a wonderful investigation is ruined by bad narration. Narrator ends every statement with sardonic accusations and conjecture. Unfortunate blunder by a normally fantastic Undisclosed team.

Way to show non bias...

 – 
Cmac201010
 – 
2017-04-05
Or not.... my goodness, way to come to your own conclusion in episode one. The woman giving the facts in regards to media conferences has specific tones and sarcasm when addressing law enforcement and discrepancies. Unsubscribing, again.

Lost me at. Season 3

 – 
Inbchi
 – 
2017-04-03
You lost me at Season 3. Truly enjoyed the first two, I just can't spend my free time listening to the biased rhetoric spewed in Season 3. I agree that the police were wrong and should have been held accountable. However, let's get back to the basics and find inconsistencies. I'll check back next season . . .

Agenda

 – 
Sentientk
 – 
2017-03-08
No longer objective, a shame.

Lose Addendum

 – 
txmavgirl
 – 
2016-10-13
Love Undisclosed but lose the Addendum. Jon Cryer tries desperately to be funny and just fails miserably. The fake chuckle "ha ha ha ha ha uuuuuum" after every sentence is so distracting and unnecessary.

Love Season 1 - Hate Jon Cryer

 – 
Smaguire925
 – 
2016-09-28
Loved the first season and love the content of the Season 2 episodes. But Jon Cryer is terrible and I just skip over the addendums even though I find them to be very informative!

Season 2/Jon Cryer

 – 
TXTennisChick
 – 
2016-07-22
I really love the details provided in this podcast, but the season 2 case isn't interesting to me so far. I could probably get into it, but the addition of Jon Cryer is a major turnoff. I'm not a fan of his in general, and he just seems out of place.

John Cryer is ruining this show

 – 
Sean3563478
 – 
2016-07-15
The addition of John C. Is ruining the show, he can not complete a sentence without uh uh uh or stuttering over words

WHY?

 – 
Fred Nieves
 – 
2016-07-12
Why the f**k is Jon cryer on here? There has to be a better moderator out there.(no offense) show is taking a major nose dive.

Get rid of Ducky

 – 
Amy45227
 – 
2016-07-07
Undisclosed was once a GREAT podcast. Now, it has been ruined by Jon Cryer.

Vacated episode

 – 
Liam915
 – 
2016-07-06
I'm not sure why Jon Cryer was pick as a guest host?If it was for celebrity appeal then I don't think he was the best choice. If you made this particular episode into a drinking game and drank once for every time Mr. Cryer said "um" and twice for when he said "uh" you would be hammered in the first five minutes.

Why John Cryer?

 – 
Annie33NYC
 – 
2016-07-05
I used to love, love, love this podcast. And then, they brought in....an actor? I don't get it and I see no useful purpose in having John Cryer on board. What made this podcast special was its focus on THE LAW via a naturalistic conversation among LAWYERS. The occasional missteps and after-the-fact clarifications were part of its charm and allowed the audience to learn right along with the hosts. This podcast does not need a smooth-talking actor in its repetoirce, no matter how well-meaning Mr. Cryer may be. Ironically, Cryer himself said on the lastest episode: "I have loved that you never pandered to your audience." How is having an actor as host anything but pandering? What is the purpose of this? The lawyers were perfectly capable of asking each other questions and making sure difficult concepts were clarified when necessary. Cryer added nothing, except a voice that was out of character, literally and metaphorically, with the other three. These three talented lawyers all have day jobs so I assume this is not about the money. The only other motivation I can think of is glory. I hope I am wrong about that. I will give this show one more chance, but I am not sure I can keep listening with this new format.

Eye opening and informative

 – 
Kem010
 – 
2016-06-28
This podcast is amazing not only for the additional information uncovered about the hae min lee case, but for information on so many criminal justice issues.

Rants and Whines

 – 
uyendelyn
 – 
2016-02-09
I listened to the first episode and skipped to the trials, because it was so boring and the delivery was horrid. I just wanted to hear about the trial and the information, but Susan is so annoying with the way she rants and is so bias. They claim this isn't a narrative and it is investigative, but shouldn't this be more objective? Susan really ruins all the informative aspects of this podcast. It just sounds like an annoying girl ranting about some dumb gossip. It makes me question her credibility talking about what happened. At least with Serial, it was unbiased.

Unsubscribed

 – 
Jjordan223
 – 
2015-08-06
It started off with so much promise, but now 8 episodes in it just seems like 3 people meet to whine about Adnan's case every other week. They are overly biased and have officially lost this listener.

Fascinating

 – 
Crocodile203
 – 
2015-07-24
The conviction of Adnan was a travesty of justice and many people should be very ashamed. These are good people doing good work.

So good

 – 
Iankicksass
 – 
2015-07-16
Susan does an Awesome job

Intelligent- amazing

 – 
odaniellek
 – 
2015-07-14
Serial was the preview and Undisclosed is the main feature with a 99% like on Rotten Tomatoes. Love the brilliance of this team of lawyers and quite honestly their voices as well.

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

 – 
Pickn farts
 – 
2015-06-27
No need to slow the talking down. Turn up the volume listeners and keep up with the pace.
Undisclosed: I love what you are doing. Keep it coming. Glad I found this podcast. I have been left in mystery after Serial ended in December. So many avenues were not spoken about in Serial. Now that I am all caught up on your podcast, I urgently have to wait for every new Undisclosed episode.

The main dish of the case

 – 
El User1
 – 
2015-06-24
If Serial is the amuse-bouche of the Adnan Syed case, Undisclosed is the savory main course. Serial introduced us to the case, whetting our appetite, getting us interested, setting our teeth on edge, preparing us for the main course. Rabia Chaudry has teamed up with two objective experts who present their arguments, not in a purely “pro-Adnan” POV, but instead, who dissects the investigation and the court defense. Each episode reveals another unbelievable detail of the case, the lack of effort from both sides, the questionable investigation techniques, etc. If this were fiction, it would be considered to be a writer’s contrivance, easily cast off as unimaginative drivel. It is shocking and downright frightening sometimes, the fact that an indictment and conviction were made based on the present facts. I race to my podcast feed every Monday and countdown the minutes until I am able to once again listen to what information Collin and Susan are ready to present.

Love this podcast

 – 
Hms60
 – 
2015-06-23
I dont understand the less than positive comments. This in depth review is not for everyone; it is, however, exactly what I needed to quiet my inner tirade that was raging at the breakdown of judicial system and search for (more precisely lack thereof )the truth that left me so unsettled after Serial (which I loved.) Lawyers weighing in on details that were clearly not thoroughly vetted by the police or Adnan Syed's lawyer has helped. I do not know whether Mr. Syed is innocent or guilty, what I do know is that he was deprived of the clealry overlooked"innocent until proven guilty." I applaud the level of detail and search for the truth. Please consider contining this podcast for other individuals whose due process was trampled.

Great Podcast!

 – 
Lauren Loves Starbucks
 – 
2015-05-30
I am obsessed with this case. This podcast expounds upon the information provided in Serial and is delivered by people who actually do legal research on a day-to-day basis. Unlike some other raters, I don't have a problem with the speed at which Susan speaks. I so appreciate the hard work that these lawyers are doing. I have an insatiable thirst for more information. Keep the podcasts coming!

Revelation After Revelation

 – 
Jennimay
 – 
2015-05-27
An unintentional/intentional companion piece to TAL's Serial, Rabia Chaudry and associates walk the listener through the evidence that was "undisclosed" in the Serial podcast. Production is of good quality and Rabia's telling of the State of Maryland's case against Adnan Sayed is chilling and revealing. Give this a listen if you enjoyed Serial.

Loving this!

 – 
chapinevet
 – 
2015-05-24
I so appreciate you all taking time to develop this podcast. And Susan, I think you're slowing down more on Episode 3 - my brain wasn't working as fast as you were talking on the earlier epidoses - I think you're doing much better now with the delivery of this incredible information!

So good

 – 
svrspy
 – 
2015-05-23
Love the insight! And they don't talk too fast. It's perfect!

Great!!

 – 
Mollylc2000
 – 
2015-05-14
I love this podcast!! I'm so curious as to what is going to happen next! BUT I'm so frustrated with Jay and Jen! How are they not arrested? Soooo strange

Love it.

 – 
RachyB.
 – 
2015-05-14
I listen for the info and each episode is packed ! If you care about the story then forget about production and enjoy !

What Serial Left Out

 – 
ThatMandy
 – 
2015-05-11
This podcast may not be as flashy and gripping as Serial, it gives us something closer to the truth of what happened to Hae. If that's something you care about, this is the podcast for you.

Amazing!!!

 – 
The Secret Sender
 – 
2015-05-04
Loving this Podcast! I am an attorney, so I'm really enjoying all of the additional legal/evidentiary insight. I wish this podcast could be every week!

The truth is in the weeds

 – 
ballookey
 – 
2015-05-04
If you’re like me, you like getting into the weeds, you don’t just want to be told the facts, you want to know how we know the facts. You want verification at every level because we could be mislead at any stage. The three attorneys of Undisclosed show how important it is to question and independently verify everything.
The first episode has some audio issues, but the following episodes get better and the important thing is the information — Undisclosed has the details to dismantle almost everything you thought you knew about this case.

Fascinating!

 – 
Awesomemathteacher
 – 
2015-04-28
The first podcast was good, but the 2nd podcast was AMAZING. It’s a lot of information to digest, and i had to go back to relisten a couple of times, but WOW. I like how detailed they lawyers get in their investigation. What DID happen to Hayes pager? Why didn’t the police get her pager records back then? Good job on drilling down to what was fact. Podcasts are certainly content dense, but I really appreciate that level of detail.

EDUCATIONAL, INFORMATIVE & AWESOME

 – 
Not feeling creative
 – 
2015-04-28
I have so much respect for all three attorneys on this podcast. I, too, am an attorney and am fascinated by the evidence, or lack thereof, in this case. This podcast is a dream come true for me (clearly I'm a nerd) because it ties all the information out there in a very clear, precise, and logical way. Thank you for taking the time to do this.

Interesting

 – 
saviem01
 – 
2015-04-21
Definitely an interesting podcast to listen to after hearing Serial. I noticed some people have a problem with the rapid speech but it doesn't really bother me. I usually have to speed podcasts up to 2x because I find people talk very slowly on them (to clearly get their point across, I get that, but it's usually just too slow for me so this is refreshing).

An addict!

 – 
dorada28
 – 
2015-04-21
I am so addicted to any news about this case. Thanks for giving us more!

Well Done

 – 
Late night
 – 
2015-04-19
I was very impressed. The discussion was well thought out and easy to follow. The panelists were thorough without over explaining. I never found myself thinking "but, wait, what about .....". The discussion was also well organized. Given that they are not trained in radio presentation, I thought they spoke very well. I never detected any signs of nervousness or awkwardness even though they must have been feeling it.
A few reviewers felt that Susan spoke too fast. I didn't have that issue.
One reviewer pointed out that the discussion would be hard to follow if you hadn't listened to the Serial podcast. However, that was well covered in the beginning of the podcast. We were told that it would be hard to follow without having heard Serial and it was suggested that we listen to the Serial podcast first. I am glad they did not review all of the material from Serial. That would have made this podcast overly complex and we would have missed the point of this podcast which is hearing all the new information and progress of the appeal.

Too biased

 – 
Rockinrobin1185
 – 
2015-04-15
I realize this podcast was started by a family friend, but in the beginning, she states she is open to alternate opinions. It doesn't take long to see that all three narrators are practicing what should be said to a jury to overturn the conviction... Totally biased! They skim over important details which seem to play a key role in the trial and focus in on tiny details that do not matter overall. They are doing nothing but trying to convince the public of Adnan's innocence. Good luck!

SLOOOOW DOOOOOWN SUUUUSAAAAN

 – 
johncroweransom
 – 
2015-04-14
This podcast is for listeners already super-familiar with Serial and its online reception and aftermath on The Intercept, Reddit, etc. No one else will understand this material. I’m one of those listeners though, so I find the material fascinating. BUT it’s very hard to understand Susan Simpson’s delivery. Sherunsallherwordstogetherwhenshereadsaloud. This is probably just a speech pattern of hers. She talks fast. But Rabia, Susan, etc, if you’re reading this—find someone to work with Susan on her delivery. I literally couldn’t understand some of what she said without “rewinding," and that’s hard in a car. I know Susan's got great material from reading her blog, but she r e a l l y n e e d s t o s l o w d o w n on the mic. I’m sure there are good coaches in the DC area who could help out. Otherwise keep it up for the die-hards. If you want to reach more than just the die-hards, don’t go into such granular detail and provide more reminders about the Big Picture in legal terms.

Finally!

 – 
iKrew1000
 – 
2015-04-14
Finally! A podcast that goes down those rabbit holes! I'm super excited for this season, but please speak sloweeeerrrrrrr...I had to listen to the podcast in its entirety 3 times, and I still feel like I missed some information.

Great

 – 
oai1010
 – 
2015-04-14
Great first episode, looking forward to hearing more about Hae's day next.

Not my favorite....

 – 
bearspea
 – 
2015-04-14
I was really looking forward to this, but after listening to the first episode I'm not sure if I'll listen again. The podcast has interesting information, but it has a weird flow. It sounds like the hosts are reading from a script & there's no natural flow to their conversations. It's almost like they're reading from a textbook. If you're a Serial fanatic, you may like it. Give it a try. :)

Its just info.. and thats good

 – 
GeraldTor
 – 
2015-04-14
First of all... I can believe one of you dummies actually wrote a review based on the preview. Genius....
Anyway... people need to go into this understanding what it is.... These guys aren't journalists, nor professional podcasters or anything like that. This podcast is straight up information by a group of people who believe Adnad is innocent.
There are no great production values , bells and whisles... Its just straight up information. There will be those who complain about the lack of fancy story tellling, or the biased approach.... well, those people simply dont understand what this podcast is supposed to be, and can go back to watching "the first 48" instead.
First episode is solid... you can tell they aren't entirely comfortable, but they held their own. I think they would benefit from hiring someone (I'm available!!!) who is a little more neutral towards syed to help them re-word some of their ideas and statements, so they dont come across as shamelessly biased.
IF you're a details geek, you'll be pleased

Exciting

 – 
Amieneelmyers
 – 
2015-04-13
I'm super excited about this show, but you guys are talking way too fast! It's a little hard to follow :( Otherwise - good work and good luck!

Definitely Worth a Listen

 – 
wjlanaberk
 – 
2015-04-13
Accessible and interesting. A great way to handle the loose ends remaining after Serial. They did there homework. Talk a bit fast in parts of first episode but feels this will be definitive companion to original Serial.

Great investigative podcast for all Serial fans!

 – 
Brendan Kenny
 – 
2015-04-13
The truth is out there about what really happened to Hae Min Lee. If anyone is going to figure it out, it's these guys. Can't wait for the next episode.

Good info

 – 
BANVH
 – 
2015-04-13
Good information but wish she didn't talk so fast it would be better;)

Great exposition!

 – 
AroundThroughandIn
 – 
2015-04-13
Where the dramatic timing of a calm recitation might not be the strong suit, this podcast does fill in this details nicely. This is a podcast of three lawyers who are laying out the facts of the case very orderly. I have been following Susan in other podcasts, it is great that she is on this team for this case. The work she put in on her blog voiced the confusion I had with the case. Thanks for putting this together.

Potential

 – 
Megs327
 – 
2015-04-13
I love all things related to this case. I find it so fascinating and am interested in hearing all points of view. I only have one request, please speak slower. It was ridiculous how fast (whoever) was talking. Thank you!

Love this people, dont like the podcast.

 – 
hammett
 – 
2015-04-13
Two people alternating reading from a script. The content is good, but the presentation needs work. A lot of work.

Thank you!!!

 – 
Fortierke
 – 
2015-04-13
Thanks for taking the time and letting us go in to the weeds with you!!! Because we want to help! Amazing job!