The first episode of season four is pretty much all about gay sex (not kidding) and anecdotes about the German army having an eyebrow stylist, or something inane. I don’t know what’s more disappointing, the actual storytelling, or the anecdotal interviews of mystery interrogators, like Mr. X. The host runs in circles talking about people who can and can’t be interviewed predicated on book deals, and documentary deals with other media companies, this leaves the podcast feeling like we are really scraping the bottom of the barrel to piece together anything that’s left to make “a story”, any story, work. The whole podcast is sticky with holes and circular “evidence” which only further pushes the story’s narrative in the direction of the author’s interest. This isn’t a hard-story with hard-evidence against Gitmo. It’s sloppy “journalism“ and more of an opinion than a report. What’s most disappointing though is the slant of anti-Americanism. If you want to be critical of the military, wars, policy: go for it. But serial has a large, diverse megaphone. This 4th season feels wildly inappropriate due to the tunnel-vision narrative, peppered with the author’s personal moral-criticism, backed mostly by stories from mystery guest. One example, the host asks “Mr. X” if he remembers what he had for breakfast prior to an interrogation, seconds later she deemed the interrogation to be illegal during a monologue. The serial producers and authors have the responsibility to be better. This isn’t a good story. It’s certainly not journalism. Shame on anybody who approved this.