To them, everything Amazon does is "concerning."
It has bits of interesting details about Amazon here and there, but after a few episodes, you kind of feel like a loser, listening to the two hosts whining about everything Amazon does. It's like everything has a surveillance/privacy concern and/or a racial and economic justice concern. They're big on asking how new technology and operations/logistics innovations from Amazon *could* be used in biased ways: intolerance against the homeless, gentrification, Islamophobia, racism, etc. I don't think they've come up with an angle related to bias against the nonbinary gendered, but I wouldn't be surprised if they're brainstorming on that. They're just so desperate to find some angle to say, in essence, that Amazon is committing LITERAL VIOLENCE against every fashionable interest group. 😂
It's like "Code Switch," but every social justice concern is related to Amazon.
But by the end of season two, they seem to be having trouble finding things to criticize: they're now talking about Amazon's patent applications, and what "concerns" the innovations therein *may* pose. Purely speculative pessimism. Weak.
The tone is so entitled: "Yeah, Amazon is making money from [whatever it is they're complaining about this week], but what benefit does it provide civil society, innumerable interest groups, and *me*? How does it make *me* feel (invariably insecure, paranoid, and "concerned")? What dangers could it pose to the [X, Y, and Z] communities? How is it biased?"
To them, technology is primarily racist, and dehumanizing, exacerbating economic inequality and degrading social interactions. It's such a downer that after a while you ask yourself if they're goofing on the audience — whether this is just trolling/podcast performance art.
But they're probably not joking. They actually see things that way. It's kind of sad.